Well, of course what he said, is what I meant in my statement, but not dwelling on the nuances of language and it's limitation - commonly known as "wordsmithing", we will look at the intent of the message. The idea is that many people get caught up in the conflict and/or some don't even get that far and avoid conflicts all together. We have come to the conclusion that conflict is a natural part of life, however a lot of people get stuck in the first stage of conflict. They don't get to the final stage of conflict, the resolution of it where a closeness and intimacy happens. They stay in the first stage of conflict where anger, hurt, frustration, and fear are ever present feelings. For those who persevere through the "rough" initial part of conflict, there is a sweetness as you come to a better understanding of yourself as well as your partner. There is also a tenderness that is felt that often is shown through laughing, crying, hugging, and other types of intimate affection. We feel the conclusion to conflict is a necessary step that many are unaware of or do not persevere to. The tragedy is that they are missing the benefit of this complete process and view conflict in a negative light as a result.
Sometimes it is difficult when someone who has had more experience of the complete process of conflict is trying to help others, whom they are in conflict with, work through this to get to that sweet side of conflict, to that resolution of better understanding and sweet closeness that comes through this process.